Zach Stephens vs Leo Matthysen Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 03 Nov at 12:00 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
Z. Stephens vs L. Matthysen

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

RSA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Stephens 1 - 0 Matthysen
They have played 3 sets in total, with Zach Stephens winning 2 and Leo Matthysen winning 1. The last match between Zach Stephens and Leo Matthysen was at the M15 Manama, 03-11-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Zach Stephens getting the victory 5-7 6-1 10-8.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Stephens | 1 |
| Matthysen | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) M15 Manama(11-03-25)
Z. Stephens vs L. Matthysen H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 48.15% (39-42) | Career Total W/L | 29.41% (10-24) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
Z. Stephens vs L. Matthysen Match Preview:
- Zach Stephens has a second serve points win rate of 38.18% in recent form, while Leo Matthysen's is slightly higher at 41.94%.
- In terms of returning, Zach Stephens captures 46.01% of second serve points from opponents compared to Leo Matthysen's 43.62%.
- When dealing with first serve returns, Zach Stephens has a superior win rate of 29.83% over Leo Matthysen's 22.37%.
- Who performs better under pressure? Zach Stephens displays stronger breakpoint saving ability at 49.65%, whereas Leo Matthysen saves 41.18%.
- Over the last year, Zach Stephens boasts a higher match win rate of 56.76%, compared to Leo Matthysen's 20.00%.
- Both players excel on Hard courts, with each having a career win rate of 55%.
- Which player has faced more challenging opponents recently? Zach Stephens’ opponents had an average rank of 163.16, while Leo Matthysen's were ranked 232.87 on average.
- If the match extends to a deciding set, Leo Matthysen has the edge, winning 50% of such occasions compared to Zach Stephens’ 30% win rate.
Editorial Prediction (November 3, 2025, UTC):
Based on second serve performance, Leo Matthysen holds a slight advantage over Zach Stephens, which could influence critical points during the match. However, Zach Stephens shows better effectiveness in return games, especially in winning first serve return points.
Zach Stephens has demonstrated a greater ability to withstand pressure, with a higher percentage of breakpoints saved. This resilience could be key in tight situations during their encounter.
Looking at their performances over the last year, Zach Stephens clearly possesses a superior overall match win percentage. Despite Leo Matthysen's decent record in deciding sets, Stephens' more challenging competition historically might translate into better preparedness for this match.
Considering these factors, Zach Stephens emerges as the favored player to win this upcoming match, combining a robust return game, pressure performance, and a higher overall match success rate.
Zach Stephens vs Leo Matthysen Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Z. Stephens vs L. Matthysen H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 21 | Games Won | 16 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:5:50 | Average Match Time | 2:5:50 |
| 71% (51/72) | 1st Serve % | 49% (35/71) |
| 63% (32/51) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (23/35) |
| 48% (10/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (13/36) |
| 33% (5/15) | Break Pts Won % | 67% (4/6) |
| 49% (35/71) | Return Points Win % | 42% (30/72) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
Z. Stephens Recent Matches Played
L. Matthysen Recent Matches Played

Z. Stephens vs L. Matthysen Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 48.15% (39/42) | YTD Win/Loss | 29.41% (10/24) |
| 47.06% (88/99) | Sets Win/Loss | 31.51% (23/50) |
| 50.17% (895/889) | Games Win/Loss | 43.31% (298/390) |
| 54.69% (35/29) | Hard Win/Loss | 29.41% (10/24) |
| 23.53% (4/13) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 69 | Aces Total | 27 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
| 172 | Total Double Faults | 85 |
| 1:12:29 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 217.83 | Average Opponent Rank | 218.74 |
| 64% (2235/3470) | 1st Serve % | 60% (710/1190) |
| 59% (1315/2235) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (421/710) |
| 45% (561/1235) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (191/480) |
| 46% (165/362) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (44/101) |
| 42% (1432/3411) | Return Points Win % | 37% (413/1111) |
| 48.15% (39/42) | Futures W/L | 29.41% (10/24) |
| 48% (38/80) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 29% (10/34) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 47% (7/15) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 29% (2/7) |
| 58% (14/24) | Deciding Set Win % | 40% (2/5) |
| 89% (37/33) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (11/9) |
| 11% (37/4) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (11/2) |
| 14% (44/6) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 4% (23/1) |